<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Damien Hirst and Sustainability &#8211; What?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thethirdray.com/conceptual-art/damien-hirst-and-sustainability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thethirdray.com/conceptual-art/damien-hirst-and-sustainability/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Art, Sustainability, Environment - a blog by Joe Zammit-Lucia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:10:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsey Matheson</title>
		<link>http://www.thethirdray.com/conceptual-art/damien-hirst-and-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey Matheson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thethirdray.com/?p=206#comment-179</guid>
		<description>His work may be an interesting commentary as you say, but does it really make him an artist?  Or is he a hoaxer or critic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His work may be an interesting commentary as you say, but does it really make him an artist?  Or is he a hoaxer or critic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Zammit-Lucia</title>
		<link>http://www.thethirdray.com/conceptual-art/damien-hirst-and-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Zammit-Lucia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thethirdray.com/?p=206#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Hi Natalie, thanks for your comment. Actually, I think that, because his art has been such a marvelous window into the fetish for wasteful consumption in our times, I think Hirst will be remembered as one of the great artists of his time.  In turn that will make his works continue to be valuable in a self-feeding virtuous circle (if you think it&#039;s virtuous!). Now he&#039;s got bored with it all and has turned his hand to painting.  It would be a shame if he finished his career by changing himself from a great artist to a mediocre painter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Natalie, thanks for your comment. Actually, I think that, because his art has been such a marvelous window into the fetish for wasteful consumption in our times, I think Hirst will be remembered as one of the great artists of his time.  In turn that will make his works continue to be valuable in a self-feeding virtuous circle (if you think it&#8217;s virtuous!). Now he&#8217;s got bored with it all and has turned his hand to painting.  It would be a shame if he finished his career by changing himself from a great artist to a mediocre painter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
